Skip to main content

Awaiting Judgement

The arguments are in; they now await judgement of the Court of Appeal - the final arbiter in matters involving the Election Petition Act.

The judgement of the Court of Appeal will be decisive as it will affect the fate of a number of the sitting members of the House of Representatives as well as those appointed to the Senate. The most profound effect could be the calling of a series of by-elections or a general election - depending on the ruling of the court.

The judgement is expected in early 2009 - in excess of 1 1/2 years since the new Parliament was convened. That cannot be a satisfactory situation where the very composition of the said Parliament is being questioned. The matters in issue involve the interpretation of provisions of the Constitution of Jamaica - ostensibly the supreme court of the land. Dependent on the nature of the ruling, it could be inferred that there has been either a conspiracy to subvert the constitution or a sacrifice of the constitution on the altar of political expediency.

The Context

After the Chief Justice handed down her findings a number of events were set in motion. Dabdoub announced that he intended to appeal the aspect of the judgement which declared that a by-election should be held instead of him being awarded the seat. Vaz initially had no problems with the Chief Justice's ruling, declared his intention to renounce his US citizenship and called for the said by-election to be held at the earliest possible date.

Then things got a bit complicated.Vaz announced his intention to file an appeal against the finding of the Chief Justice that his dual citizenship had disqualified him from being duly nominated. This was done as a so called "strategic move" - ostensibly to ensure that he remained in Parliament until the appeal was decided. Vaz subsequently renounced his US citizenship, issued repeated calls for Dabdoub to withdraw his appeal and proceed forthwith to the by-election.

Dabdoub stood firm, working the image of the protector/guardian of the Constitution of Jamaica to counter the political propaganda that he could only win the seat by court action not by an election.

The political situation became even more complex as the opposition People's National Party launched a number of legal challenges (seemingly spearheaded by Dabdoub himself) on a number of Government members centred around their alleged dual citizenship.

Enter Prime Minister Bruce Golding. His stance is that he would not allow anyone to sit in Parliament who was not elected by the people- ie. who gained the seat as a result of court adjudication.

The Submissions

The submissions of Dabdoub and Vaz are public documents; however the matters are under consideration by a court of law and as such the sub judice rule applies. In the interest of public awareness - especially those with vested interest - we intend to facilitate widespread access to those submissions. We do so without any comment on the merits of the cases.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Declaration" Not "Determination"

Both the Prime Minister and the Speaker of the House of Representatives have conveniently confused calls for declaration of citizenship status by Members of either House with the determination of questions as to membership of either House. The Chief Justice of Jamaica has determined that individuals who have renewed their US passports and travelled thereon are disqualified from being validly elected or appointed as a Member of either House. Proponents of the impotence of the Speaker, in the matter of requiring a declaration by individual members, have sought to rely on Section 44 (1) of the Constitution which states: Any question whether - a. any person has been validly elected or appointed as a member of either House; or b. any member of either House has vacated his seat therein or is required, under the provisions of subsection (3) or subsection (4) of section 41 of this Constitution, to cease to exercise any of his functions as a member, shall be determined by the Supreme Court ...

By-Election Predisposition

Introduction A massive amount of time and resources have been devoted to the issue of the course to be properly taken once a victorious electoral candidate has been found to be "disqualified" under S. 40 of the Constitution of Jamaica. Simply put, the crux of the matter is whether the second place candidate should, without more, be accorded the seat by the court; or that the said election be deemed null and void and a by-election ordered to decide the people's representative. This matter consumed inordinate amounts of energy - judicial and otherwise - due primarily to the silence of the Constitution on what recourse should be adopted in such circumstance. A cardinal tenet of democratic government is that the people must decide their representatives and not a select grouping - no matter their qualification or status. The Constitution of Jamaica fully recognized this imperative even though it expressly delegates the determination of questions as to membership of either Ho...

Communication Error!

Jamaica Gleaner Contributor, Martin Henry has written an interesting article entitled “Victory for the rule of law” published on Sunday, April 20, 2008 . In his last paragraph Henry stated: " A troubled citizen's concerns about the legitimacy of laws passed in the past with the participation of MPs who may have been in Daryl Vaz's dual-allegiance position was published as The Letter of the Day by The Gleaner last Wednesday [April 16]. Lawyer Dr Paul Ashley made a great deal out of the same issue when we both appeared on the TV programme Impact on that same day. The Constitution dissolves these fears in the wisely anticipatory provision of Section 51 (2): "The presence or participation of any person not entitled to be present or to participate in the proceedings of the House shall not invalidate those proceedings." Interpreting legal provisions is an exercise fraught with dangers, especially if one is not acquainted with the rules governing interpretation. Without...