Skip to main content

DEA: Authority To Proceed


Below is the substance of The  Authority To Proceed signed by Dorothy Lightbourne, Minister of Justice, dated May 18, 2010



                                                     THE EXTRADITION ACT 1991

                                                        AUTHORITY TO PROCEED

To the Resident Magistrate for the Corporate Area

WHEREAS a request has been duly made to me, Dorothy Lightbourne, Minister of Justice, on behalf of the United States of America for the surrender of fugitive Christopher Michael Coke, aka Michael Christopher Coke, aka Paul Christopher Scott, aka “Presi”, aka “General”, aka “President”, aka “Duddus”, aka “Shortman” who is accused of the extradition offences of (1) Conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms and more of mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of marijuana and 5 kilograms and more of mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of cocaine; (2) Conspiracy to traffic in firearms without a licence, subject of a superseding indictment No. S15 07 Cr. 971 (RPP) filed on 19th February, 2009 in the United States District court for the Southern District of New York, and Warrant of Arrest No. S15 07 Cr. 971 (RPP) issued on 19th day of February, 2009 by Debra Freeman, United States Magistrate Judge, in the same Court, within the jurisdiction of the United States of America.


NOW I HEREBY, by this Order under my hand and seal, signify to you that such request has been made, and require you to proceed on the issuance of a Warrant for the apprehension of such fugitive provided that the conditions of the Extradition Act, 1991, relating to the issue of such Warrant, are, in your judgment, complied with.

GIVEN UNDER the hand and seal of the undersigned Minister of Justice this   day of   2010.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Appealing the By-Election Order

Abraham Dabdoub's appeal against the Chief Justice's ruling can be divided into two overlapping and intertwined phases: That the Chief Justice erred in law by failing to award the seat to the only duly nominated candidate on Nomination Day, August 7, 2007 in the constituency of West Portland; and That the Chief Justice erred in law by failing to recognize and properly apply the distinction between " status " and " conduct " in coming to her decision on disqualification based on dual citizenship. Numerous cases on votes being declared to be "thrown away" and the next candidate being duly seated by the court are cited. The detailed submissions are set out below: Publish at Scribd or explore others: Law
Post a Comment
Read more

"Declaration" Not "Determination"

Both the Prime Minister and the Speaker of the House of Representatives have conveniently confused calls for declaration of citizenship status by Members of either House with the determination of questions as to membership of either House. The Chief Justice of Jamaica has determined that individuals who have renewed their US passports and travelled thereon are disqualified from being validly elected or appointed as a Member of either House. Proponents of the impotence of the Speaker, in the matter of requiring a declaration by individual members, have sought to rely on Section 44 (1) of the Constitution which states: Any question whether - a. any person has been validly elected or appointed as a member of either House; or b. any member of either House has vacated his seat therein or is required, under the provisions of subsection (3) or subsection (4) of section 41 of this Constitution, to cease to exercise any of his functions as a member, shall be determined by the Supreme Court ...
3 comments
Read more