Skip to main content

DEA: Warrant Of Minister For Extradition of Fugitive

                             



Below is the substance of the Warrant signed by Dorothy Lightbourne, Minister of Justice,
dated June 24, 2010:  giving governmental approval for the extradition of  Christopher "Dudus" Coke.    


                                         THE EXTRADITION ACT 1991
               
                    WARRANT OF MINISTER FOR EXTRADlTION OF FUGITIVE

To the Superintendent of the Red Fence Adult Correctional Centre, Kingston, and to all and each of the Constables of the Jamaica Constabulary Force:

WHEREAS a request has been made to me for the surrender of
Christopher Michael Coke aka “Michael Christopher Coke”, aka “Paul Christopher Scott”, aka “Presi” aka “General” aka “President” aka “Duddus” aka “Shortman”, accused of the extradition offences of (1) Conspiracy to Distribute and to Possess with the Intent to Distribute 1,000 kilograms and more of mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of Marijuana, and 5 kilograms and more mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount cocaine, (2) Conspiracy to traffic in firearms without a licence, subject of a superseding Indictment Case number S15 07 Cr. 971 (RPP) filed on February 19, 2009 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and a Warrant of Arrest S15 07 Cr. 971 (RPP) issued on 19th February, 2009 by Debra Freeman, United States Magistrate Judge of the same Court, within the jurisdiction of the United States of America, and inasmuch as the provisions of Section 17(2) of the Act with regard to his committal have been satisfied, was delivered into the custody of you, the Superintendent of the Red Force Correctional Centre, Kingston, by Warrant of Committed dated 24th June, 2010 pursuant to the Extradition Act, 1991:

AND WHEREAS Christopher Michael Coke aka “Michael Christopher Coke”, aka “Paul Christopher Scott”, aka “Presi” aka “General” aka “President” aka “Duddus” aka “Shortman”, has not been discharged by order of the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeal,
I am satisfied that there is no provision of the said Act prohibiting his extradition:

THEREFORE I do hereby order that Christopher Michael Coke aka “Michael Christopher Coke”, aka “Paul Christopher Scott”, aka “Presi” aka “General” aka “President” aka “Duddus” aka “Shortman”, be extradited to the United States of America in respect of the said offences for which he was committed to custody by the Court of Committal.

GIVEN under the hand and seal of the undersigned Minister of Justice
this    day  of    2010.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Appealing the By-Election Order

Abraham Dabdoub's appeal against the Chief Justice's ruling can be divided into two overlapping and intertwined phases: That the Chief Justice erred in law by failing to award the seat to the only duly nominated candidate on Nomination Day, August 7, 2007 in the constituency of West Portland; and That the Chief Justice erred in law by failing to recognize and properly apply the distinction between " status " and " conduct " in coming to her decision on disqualification based on dual citizenship. Numerous cases on votes being declared to be "thrown away" and the next candidate being duly seated by the court are cited. The detailed submissions are set out below: Publish at Scribd or explore others: Law
Post a Comment
Read more

"Declaration" Not "Determination"

Both the Prime Minister and the Speaker of the House of Representatives have conveniently confused calls for declaration of citizenship status by Members of either House with the determination of questions as to membership of either House. The Chief Justice of Jamaica has determined that individuals who have renewed their US passports and travelled thereon are disqualified from being validly elected or appointed as a Member of either House. Proponents of the impotence of the Speaker, in the matter of requiring a declaration by individual members, have sought to rely on Section 44 (1) of the Constitution which states: Any question whether - a. any person has been validly elected or appointed as a member of either House; or b. any member of either House has vacated his seat therein or is required, under the provisions of subsection (3) or subsection (4) of section 41 of this Constitution, to cease to exercise any of his functions as a member, shall be determined by the Supreme Court ...
3 comments
Read more